State v. Bohannon

CROW, Presiding Judge.

A jury found appellant Daniel R. Bohan-non guilty of escape from confinement and the trial court sentenced him, as a persistent offender, to ten years’ imprisonment.

Appellant presents two points relied on, the first of which consists of components “A” and “B.” Component “A” avers the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; component “B” alleges there was a “fatal variance” between the amended information on which appellant was tried and the proof at trial. Appellant’s second point maintains the charge should have been dismissed for lack of a speedy trial.

In…