Legal Opinion

Leal v. Leal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 14, 1928No. 7962PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

Plaintiff in error sues defendant in error for an accounting and for damages. It is the same cause of action asserted in Leal v. Leal, 291 S. W. 340, once before this court. That case shows the nature of the suit, except that the pleading was amended in this case. It was designated plaintiff’s fifth original petition, upon which this case proceeded to trial. The amended pleading does not materially change the original pleading nor the cause of action. Defendant in error answered by general demurrer, pleas of two, three, and five years’ limitation, and general denial. For special answer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Garrett v. ChristopherTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Leal v. LealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Young v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. McKee v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Leal v. LealTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Wilson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Lerer v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API