Legal Opinion

Caley v. Kohlstad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1956No. 9258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANDERSON:

This is an appeal by John IT. Caley as liquidating trustee of Time Construction Company, Inc., plaintiff below, from a judgment in favor of Henry Kohlstad and Mabel Kohlstad, defendants below.

The pleadings are, of themselves, difficult to understand, but were not challenged below. Under State ex rel. Olsen v. Sundling, 128 Mont. 596, 281 Pac. (2d) 499, and other cases, the pleadings are therefore deemed amended to conform with the proof where, as here, the evidence went in without objection. Therefore it is the evidence in the record before us which determines on this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bennett v. DodgsonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Olsen v. SundlingMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Teagarden v. CalkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank L. Pirtz Construction, Inc. v. Hardin Town Pump, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hart v. HonrudMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hart v. HonrudMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API