Legal Opinion

Crowding v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 22, 2019No. 16-876Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: February 26, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PUBLISHED PATRICIA CROWDING, * * No. 16-876V Petitioner, * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Respondent’s Objections to * Good Faith and Reasonable Respondent. * Basis; Amended Records. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, for petitioner. Heather L. Pearlman, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.1 DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Amanda Beck, a Minor, by Her Father, Henry J. Beck v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Perreira v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API