Legal Opinion

Matter of Mt. Pleasant Bank and Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 18, 1990No. 89-643PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

A failed bank had served as trustee for bondholders who invested in a local industry. A successor trustee brought this equity action against the bank and a second bank which participated in loaning funds to the industry. The action is based on theories of breach of fiduciary duty. The district court ruled in favor of plaintiff trustee and fashioned a remedy intended to restore the parties to the status quo prior to the breach of fiduciary duty. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

On our de novo review we reach the same factual findings as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Metge v. BaehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Bernier v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Berryhill v. HattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Midwest Management Corp. v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Clinton Land Co. v. M/S ASSOCIATES, INC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reisenauer v. SchaeferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. White v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Monster Heavy Haulers, LLC v. Goliath Energy Services, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Board v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. MacAl v. StinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API