Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Estate of Hunter ex rel. Hunter v. Young

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 2004No. 29A02-0306-CV-474Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Judge

I fully agree that failure of the plaintiff to tender a summons to the Clerk within the period of the Statute of Limitations is fatal to the claim of Hunter's Estate.

However, it occurs to me that there exists a second defect in the filing of the Estate's complaint.. Under the circumstances, Hunter's estate had no choice but to seek appointment of a personal representative for the deceased Young and to have the summons issued to that personal representative.

I would further. observe that St. Clair could not be the agent of Young for the purpose of receiving service of summons because Young was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sawers Grain Co. v. GoodwineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Luhring Lumber Co. v. BeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API