Legal Opinion

Moore v. the Kroger Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1953No. 34414PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

It has been said times without number that questions of negligence are ordinarily for the jury, and that, where it is contended that the plaintiff’s injuries were due to her own failure to exercise ordinary care, this is a jury question unless it is so plain and indisputable that the minds of reasonable men would not disagree upon the proposition. While this is unquestioned as a rule of law, its application to the facts of a particular case is not unattended by difficulty. It was, however, held as a matter of law in McMullan v. The Kroger Co., 84 Ga. App. 195 (65 S. E. 2d, 420), that one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wynne v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Glover v. City Council of AugustaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. McMullan v. the Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Stenhouse v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Forde v. Citizens & Southern Georgia Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Miller v. BartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API