Legal Opinion
Wauconda Fire Protection District v. Stonewall Orchards, LLP
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 2, 2003No. 2-02-1116PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley
Plaintiff, the Wauconda Fire Protection District (District), sought an injunction against defendants, Stonewall Orchards, LLP (Stonewall), and Lake County (County), to enforce a District ordinance. The trial court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss. The District appeals, arguing that its ordinance is valid and enforceable in unincorporated Lake County. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the cause.
BACKGROUND
Stonewall is a privately owned golf course open to the public, located within the common boundaries of unincorporated Lake County and the District. Stonewall submitted plans…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- County of Du Page v. Graham, Anderson, Probst & White, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Carver v. Sheriff of La Salle CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Bowes v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Carroll v. PaddockIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Byron Dragway, Inc. v. County of OgleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wauconda Fire Protection District v. Stonewall Orchards, LLPIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Wickman v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- In re Commitment of MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
- Wauconda Fire Protection District v. Stonewall Orchards, LLPIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Wauconda Fire Protection District v. Stonewall Orchards, LLPIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.