Valdez v. Tramel
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Justice.
These consolidated petitions seek review of McCaskill v. McMillan, 563 So.2d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the question presented regarding the interpretation of rule 3.133(b)(6),1 Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, concerning the timely charging of defendants by indictment or information as a matter of great public importance. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution.
*162We answered this question m Bowens v. Tyson, 578 So.2d 696 (Fla.1991), holding that rule 3.138(b)(6) does not mandate a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowens v. TysonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- In re Amendment to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure-Rule 3.133(b)(6) (Pretrial Release)Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
- McCaskill v. McMillanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Drayton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989