Legal Opinion

Valdez v. Tramel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 20, 1991No. Nos. 76260, 76310 and 76311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OVERTON, Justice.

These consolidated petitions seek review of McCaskill v. McMillan, 563 So.2d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the question presented regarding the interpretation of rule 3.133(b)(6),1 Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, concerning the timely charging of defendants by indictment or information as a matter of great public importance. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution.

*162We answered this question m Bowens v. Tyson, 578 So.2d 696 (Fla.1991), holding that rule 3.138(b)(6) does not mandate a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowens v. TysonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. In re Amendment to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure-Rule 3.133(b)(6) (Pretrial Release)Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. McCaskill v. McMillanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Drayton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API