Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Canale Ex Rel. Hall v. Minimum Salary Department of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1972Published

1DissentCreson, Justice

With all respect I must dissent from the Opinion of the majority in this case. This follows from the specific nature and restrictive character of the language of the discretionary appeal statute, itself.

*14The instant case involves a quo warranto action instituted in the Chancery Court of Shelby County, Part II, pursuant to the provisions of T.C.A. § 23-2801 et seq. Appellants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12.02 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. The Chancellor overruled the motion and granted a discretionary appeal to this Court.

The State of Tennessee, hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. WardTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Employers' Indemnity Co. v. WillardTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Grant v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API