Legal Opinion

Foreign Venture Limited Partnership v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Silverman, J.

Defendants appeal from orders of Special Term granting a preliminary injunction against payments under certain letters of credit, and denying defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint under CPLR 3211.

Plaintiff, an American partnership, wished to make arrangements for financing of its Australian affiliate, Venture Carpets PTY., Ltd. ("PTY”), by defendant Commercial Banking Company of Sydney, Ltd. ("Commercial”). Accordingly, plaintiff arranged with defendant Chemical Bank ("Chemi*354cal”), a New York corporation, for the issuance by Chemical to Commercial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shanghai Commercial Bank, Ltd. v. Bank of Boston InternationalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Capehart Corp. v. Shanghai Commercial Bank, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Belgium, S.A. v. Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. First Arlington National Bank v. StathisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Key International Manufacturing, Inc. v. StillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Banque Worms v. Banque Commerciale PriveeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API