Legal Opinion
United States v. Phillip L. Nolan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 24, 1990No. 87-2685PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Phillip Nolan of entering a federally-insured savings and loan with the intent to commit larceny, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Nolan appeals, and we affirm.
I
On the morning of October 6,1986, Linda Carmody and Vicky Romans, tellers at the *1556Marquette Savings & Loan (“the bank” or “Marquette Savings”) in Milwaukee noticed three young black men — whom they later identified in court as Nolan and co-defendants Archie Gill and Jeffrey Johnson— park their car in a lot behind the bank. This struck Romans as unusual because customers very rarely used this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Rivera-RosarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Jang Han Bae v. Howard Peters, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert J. Amico, Richard N. AmicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Victor Elizondo, Juan Carlos Colin, Valdemar Colin, Alejandro Rodriguez and Fernando RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.