Abraham v. Owens
Oregon Supreme Court
Douglas county: R. S. Bean, Judge. Defendant appeals. This controversy arises on the cross-bill filed by the respondent to the appellant's complaint in the original action of Nannie L. Owens v. Sol. Abraham pending in the circuit court of Douglas county, Oregon.
Read the full summary
Douglas county: R. S. Bean, Judge. Defendant appeals. This controversy arises on the cross-bill filed by the respondent to the appellant's complaint in the original action of Nannie L. Owens v. Sol. Abraham pending in the circuit court of Douglas county, Oregon. The cross-bill alleges substantially the following facts: That this plaintiff is the owner in fee simple and in the possession of the following described tract of land situated in the county of Douglas and state of Oregon, to wit: Beginning at the northeast corner of block 33, in the town of Roseburg, on Spruce street; running thence…
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, C. J.
— The parcel of land in controversy in this suit consists of about one acre. It was conceded upon the argument here, and the evidence very satisfactorily establishes the fact, that the tract is included within the calls of the plaintiff’s deeds, and that he is entitled to the same unless his right thereto is defeated by one or both of the defenses pleaded in the defendant’s answer. It is to the answer, then, and the facts shown in support thereof, that our attention must be directed.
The first question demanding our attention is the judgment pleaded in the answer as an estoppel. In the first…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dunckel v. . WilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collard v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Ream v. KeenOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Hume v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1907