Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Alexander M. Goldberg v. Hon. Julius J. Hoffman, Hon. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Hon. H. Brian Holland and Hon. Robert Tieken
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 22, 1955No. 11469_1PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
The court having granted leave to file, this cause is before us on Goldberg’s original petition for a writ of mandamus or other appropriate relief. The respondents are the Honorable Julius J. Hoffman, Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Honorable Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States; Honorable H. Brian Holland, Assistant Attorney General of the United States, and Honorable Robert Tieken, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois.
Goldberg’s prayer is that respondents be enjoined from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Nelson A. RockefellerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Diana Kearny Powell v. Nicholas Katzenbach, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Peek v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Alvin JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.