Williams v. Van Kemp
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
Was the lower court correct in holding that the Act of April 16, 1840, * providing for the transfer of a judgment from one county to another county within the Commonwealth, requires “a certified copy of the whole record in the case,” or is an exemplified copy of the Appearance Docket and the Judgment Docket sufficient? This is the narrow and sole question involved.
The case arose on a scire facias to revive and continue the lien of a judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County on an “exemplification of the docket record of the case ... as the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank and Tr. Co. v. LaubachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- King v. NimickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Shotts Co. v. Agnew, and BarnettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Nelson v. GuffeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Lehigh & New England Railroad v. HanhauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. Van CampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Selden v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Oringer v. Zimmerman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1955