Legal Opinion

Dredla v. Baache

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1900No. 11,322PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Holmes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

It is argued in this action that the order or judgment of allowance, by the probate judge, of certain claims against the estate represented by the administrator, as plaintiff in error, and in favor of the defendant in error, is utterly void, and for that reason the order upon the administrator to pay said claims as a valid charge against *657the estate is erroneous and of no force or effect. The order of payment complained of was made by the probate judge of Lancaster county, where the estate was being administered, and an appeal was taken to the district court, where the order was affirmed, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Hamlin v. KassaferOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cox v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weiner v. HansNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. KidderNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Tucker v. Heirs, Devisees, Legatees, Personal RepresentativesNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re HansNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. ConAgra, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API