Taylor v. Beekley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 234, Jan. T., 1903, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., Oct. T., 1902, No. 19, on verdict for defendant in case of Emily E. Taylor v. Caroline Beekley and M. F. Beekley. Ejectment for land in Honeybrook Township. Before Butleb, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court gave binding instructions for defendant. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 234, Jan. T., 1903, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., Oct. T., 1902, No. 19, on verdict for defendant in case of Emily E. Taylor v. Caroline Beekley and M. F. Beekley. Ejectment for land in Honeybrook Township. Before Butleb, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court gave binding instructions for defendant. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was in giving binding instructions for defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Potteb,
It appears from the undisputed facts in this case that Mary E. Wilson executed a mortgage to James B. Ralston et al, upon a tract of land in Chester county to secure the payment of $3,500 with interest. The property was subsequently con*608veyed by Mary E. Wilson to Caroline Beekley and M. F. Beekley, the appellees, subject to the lien of the mortgage. Thereafter, a scire facias was issued under the mortgage; Mary E. Wilson, the mortgagor, was made a party, as were the terre-tenants. But no service of the writ was made upon the mortgagor. It was served upon the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Roberts v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Land Bank of Balto. v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Carrozza v. National Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Roush v. HerbickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Musser v. Grove, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1930