Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Ernesto

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1932No. 14114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

Plaintiff claims damages ex delicto. There are two defendants, with only one of whom, Gutierrez, we are at this time concerned.

Being unable to effect service of citation upon Gutierrez, who, in the original petition, was alleged to be a resident of the city of New Orleans, plaintiff filed a supplemental petition in which she averred that said defendant “is presently out of -the state and that a curator ad hoc should be appointed to represent him and stand in judgment herein.”

In accordance with the prayer of the said supplemental petition, Neil A. Armstrong, Jr., an attorney at law, was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Dreville v. CuculluSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ErnestoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Ory v. BosioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  3. Ory v. BosioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API