Legal Opinion

(PC) Sambrano v. Cates

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 22, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01456Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 OSCAR FERNANDO SAMBRANO, 1:21-cv-01456-GSA-PC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS 12 vs. BARRED BY HECK V. HUMPHREY,

512 U.S. 477

(1994) AND EDWARDS v. 13 CATES, et al., BALISOK,

520 U.S. 641

(1997) 14 (ECF No. 6.) Defendants. 15 30 DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff, Oscar Fernando Sambrano, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 17 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 18 commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Doddridge v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation. Appeal of Allied-Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API