Rogers v. Taintor
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
The petition in the present case does not seek the appointment of a receiver, or any other equitable relief, as was true in Rogers v. Taintor, 199 Ga. 192 (33 S. E. 2d 708). The allegations and the prayers demonstrate that this is an action at law, and is not an equity case within the provisions of the Constitution, art. VI, sec. II, par. IV (Code, Ann., § 2-3704). See Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538); Robinson v. Lindsey, 184 Ga. 684 (192 S. E. 910); Atlanta Finance Co. v. Fitzgerald, 189 Ga. 121 (5 S. E. 2d 242); White v. Georgia Railroad &.c. Co., 197 Ga. 238…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burress v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Atlanta Finance Company v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Rogers v. TaintorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Robinson v. LindseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- White v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1944