Legal Opinion

Sur v. R.W. Otts, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1990No. A14-89-01168-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

In this appeal from a judgment in a suit on a sworn account, appellee, R.W. Otts, Inc., contests our jurisdiction, alleging that appellant, Sudha Sur, failed to timely file her cost bond on appeal. Appellant contends she did not receive “actual knowledge” of the judgment until more than twenty days after it was signed, therefore the appellate timetable began on the date notice was received. Tex.R.Civ.P. 306a(4); Tex.R.App.P. 5(b)(4). On January 25, 1990, we dismissed her appeal for want of jurisdiction; the same day, appellant filed a motion to extend the effective date…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nuchia v. Woodruff, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Vineyard Bay Development Co. v. Vineyard on Lake TravisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Conaway v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Big Dawgs Saloon, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  5. Charles T. Conaway v. Jose Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API