Legal Opinion
American Nat. Bank of Oklahoma v. Garland
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1921No. 266-3489PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Eirst Supreme Judicial District. Action by the American National Bank of Oklahoma against D. N. Garland. Judgment of the district court dismissing the suit was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (220 S. W. 397), and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Plaintiff in error brought suit in the district court for Oklahoma county, state of Oklahoma, against D. N. Garland, J. C. Barr, and E. H. Perry, on a note made and executed by them payable to the bank for the principal sum of $5,000, interest and attorney’s fees. The court’s decree, dated April 1, 1915, omitting preliminaries, is as follows:
“For good cause shown the cause is continued as to defendant J. C. Barr.
*563“It is therefore by the court considered, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that plaintiff American National Bank, a corporation, have and recover judgment of and from defendants D. N.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Harn v. PhelpsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Merrill v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Vardeman v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co. v. HertzbergTexas Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Ferguson-McKinney Dry Goods Co. v. GarrettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Ex Parte PadfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Wilcox v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.