Legal Opinion

Craver v. Dixie Furniture Company

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided April 13, 1993No. I.C. No. 771691Published

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff's estoppel argument is built on a showing that the employer's provision of a simple method for employees to see to payment for their medical needs — i.e., reporting to the plant nurse, who would set in motion evaluation and filing under group medical or workers' compensation — tended to lull or mislead the claimant into believing that taking this step preserved all her rights. However, the courts do not find a defendant estopped from raising the G.S. § 97-24 jurisdictional defense grounded only on actual acceptance of the claim, payment of cash compensation and related medical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Gantt v. Edmos Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Knight v. Cannon Mills Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API