Legal Opinion
Lampesis v. Comolli
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 24, 1958No. 4631PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The defendant first argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the action of deceit and therefore, this being the only count submitted to the jury, judgment should be entered in his favor. To determine the validity of this claim it is necessary to examine the facts in some detail. Taking the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff, as the law requires us to do (Chase v. Company, 95 N. H. 483), it appears the jury could find, among others, the following facts.
The defendant, Joseph F. Comolli, was the president and treasurer of New Hampshire Explosives Machinery Company, and also the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Lawrence Nickerson v. Matco Tools Corporation, a Division of the Jacobs Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- State v. CochranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Wilko of Nashua, Inc. v. Tap Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Caledonia, Inc. v. TrainorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.