Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 2, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01823Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 NEIL A. MCFARLAND, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. C20-1823 TSZ 10 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE ORDER 11 COMPANY OF AMERICA, 12 Defendant. 13 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for 14 judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, or in the alternative, cross-motions 15 for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, docket nos. 16 and 24. 16 This action concerns Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America’s denial of 17 Plaintiff Neil McFarland’s application for long-term…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Joseph Lydon v. Boston Sand & Gravel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara v. U.S. Dept., InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API