Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. Ace Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a personal injury action, the defendant Ace Transit Corp. appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), dated July 22, 1983, as directed it to interpose its answer within 30 days after service upon it of a copy of said order.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Based upon the circumstances of this case, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in excusing plaintiff’s failure to enter a default judgment and by directing the appellant to belatedly answer the plaintiff’s complaint (CPLR 3215 [c]). Plaintiff demonstrated sufficient cause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herzbrun v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ingenito v. Grumman Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Iorizzo v. MattikowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Fazio v. C.B. Warehousing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Duperval v. HoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Magliore v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API