Commonwealth v. Hollihan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence of life imprisonment entered against appellant following his conviction by a jury of first-degree murder.
Appellant’s issues on appeal are that: (1) The trial court erred in admitting an out-of-court statement under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule; (2) the trial court erred in admitting the “psychological” testimony of Detective Payne; (3) appellant’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a portion of the trial court’s jury charge; and (4) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. WorrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FrederickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Com. v. Hollihan, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Soler, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019