Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota, Spannaus v. Callaway
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 9, 1975No. 3-75-Civ-120PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action brought by the State of Minnesota against certain federal officials, the issue is whether the U. S. Corps of Engineers must comply with Minnesota laws and regulations governing pollution abatement in its dredging operations on the Mississippi River and elsewhere. We hold it must.
The matter is before the court on fendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12 based on their allegations that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because there are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Minnesota, by Its Attorney General, Warren Spannaus, and Its Pollution Control Agency v. Martin R. Hoffman, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Township of Long Beach v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
- Save Our Sound Fisheries Ass'n v. CallawayDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977
- California Ex Rel. State Air Resources Board v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Concerned Citizens of Bushkill Township v. CostleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978