Legal Opinion

Rubinstein v. Lucchese, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 7, 2016No. 02-15-00317-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KERRY FITZGERALD, JUSTICE

I. Introduction

In this accelerated, interlocutory appeal, Appellant Stan Rubinstein challenges the trial court’s order denying his special appearance. We affirm.

II. Background

This case presents the question of whether the trial court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Rubinstein as an individual nonresident “guarantor.” Rubinstein claims he did not execute a guaranty, but even if such a guaranty existed, Rubinstein claims there are not the requisite minimum contacts such that a Texas court can- exercise specific jurisdiction over him.

According to the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Compass Bank v. Jerry DurantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Northwest Cattle Feeders, LLC, Riley Livestock, Inc., and Jeff Cox v. Jason O'Connell and Tom O'Connell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
  3. Slant Operating v. Octane Energy OperatingTexas Business Court · 2025
  4. Atmos Energy Corporation v. Charles L. Paul, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020
  5. CCPA Enterprises, Inc. and Rickey Conradt v. Bedford Hospitality Investments, LLC D/B/A Holiday Inn - Bedford, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API