Legal Opinion
Hollingsworth v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1997No. 95-7091PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff Patricia Hollingsworth alleges that defendants Arnold Hill and Richard McPeak violated her rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments when they searched her hotel room and seized her two children during the service of a protective order. Ms. Hollingsworth appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment to Hill and McPeak. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are not in dispute. On January 7, 1993, Patricia Hollingsworth fought with her husband. The…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Schneider v. City of Grand Junction Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- C.A. Brokaw v. Mercer County, James Brokaw, Weir BrokawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Tenenbaum v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.