Legal Opinion

Khosrovschahi v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 23, 1950No. 54347; protests 144655-K (A) and 144655-K (B) (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

Two protests are involved here directed against the imposition of duty upon merchandise covered by the same entries. The commodity imported consisted of washed camel’s hair carpet wool imported from Iran. At the trial of the case counsel for the Government moved to dismiss protest No. .144655-K (A) as premature under section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Ruling on the motion was reserved. In his brief counsel for the plaintiff states that inasmuch as the issue is the same in each protest, no objection is made to the motion to dismiss said protest. The motion is therefore…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hudson Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Khosrovschahi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API