Legal Opinion

Smith v. James Thompson & Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 28, 2007No. 610, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice,

for the Majority.

In this appeal, we again consider whether a claimant who suffers a work-related injury is entitled to disability compensation based only on a treating doctor’s instruction not to work. That was our holding in Gilliard-Belfast v. Wendy’s, Inc.1 Since the Gilliard-Belfast decision, however, questions have arisen about the scope and applicability of the “no work order” rule. The rationale of the Gilliard-Belfast rule is that, until the Industrial Accident Board decides the issue, a claimant should be able to rely on his or her doctor’s determination that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clements v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Delhaize America, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Parcel Service v. Ashley A. Smith IABSupreme Court of Delaware · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API