Holdeman v. Epperson
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 24} I respectfully dissent. I believe that in enacting R.C. 1705.21, the General Assembly simply intended to clarify what rights an executor is entitled to exercise in situations that the operating agreement may not have addressed. Any broader interpretation flies in the face of limited-liability operating agreements. If the operating agreement already defines the rights of the parties upon a member’s death, then no statute can interfere with those contract rights. Therefore, I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and hold that the operating agreement of a limited liability…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Holdeman v. Epperson, Unpublished Decision (7-22-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005