Newman v. State

on rehearing.

February 2, 1910.

RAMSEY, Judge.

In this case the appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in which the correctness of the court’s opinion as to the sufficiency of the information is attacked on the ground that the exceptions in the Act defining the offense are not negatived, and in said motion we are cited to the case of Salter v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 591, and the contention is earnestly made that the opinion' herein is in conflict with the decision of that case. Our opinion is, however, that there is no conflict in the two cases. Counsel, as we think, seems to have…