Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spillman v. Dunbar State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1930No. 26942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dineen, District Judge.

This case arises out of the failure of the Dunbar State Bank of Dunbar, Nebraska. Intervener John T. Mead purchased through the defendant Dunbar State Bank, then solvent, liberty bonds in the principal sum of $1,700. These bonds were left at the bank for safe-keeping; and on July 5, 1928, the bank being then insolvent, intervener immediately called at the defendant bank for his bonds, and was informed by Mr. Eiser, special agent for the guaranty fund commission for the state of Nebraska, that the bonds had been sold some time prior by Mr. Murray, the absconded president…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Spillman v. Clinton State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Magruder v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  2. Gislason v. GislasonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Re GislasonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API