Legal Opinion
Markiewicz v. Thompson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
In this action for personal injuries, there was a verdict for defendant. The trial judge set the verdict aside as against the weight of evidence. The Appellate Division unanimously reversed the order and reinstated the verdict. From the judgment entered upon the verdict, the plaintiff has taken this appeal after leave to appeal had been denied by the Appellate Division and by this court.
By the settled practice of this court, a judgment of the Appellate Division unanimously reversing an order of the trial judge for a new trial, and reinstating the verdict, is tantamount to the unanimous…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Garrison v. . Sun Printing and Publishing AssociationNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Huda v. . American Glucose Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Burns Manufacturing Co. v. . Clinchfield Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Alberti v. . HeinemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Connor v. PapertsianNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Fitzgibbons Boiler Co. v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Mikula v. DulibaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In Re the Arbitration Between Morris White Fashions, Inc. & Susquehanna Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Matter of Pine Street Realty Company v. Nik CoutroulasNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.