State v. Youngblood
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
This is an interlocutory appeal by the prosecution pursuant to K. S. A. 22-3603 and Rules of the Supreme Court, Rule No. 17 (214 Kan. xxxiii). The appeal is from an order suppressing the use of quantities of marijuana and cocaine as evidence in the prosecution of William Arles Youngblood for possession of such controlled substances after having been previously convicted of the possession of marijuana. These controlled substances were suppressed by the district court on a finding that they were illegally seized in an unlawful general…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. SchurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- State v. BoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- State v. McClellandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. PattersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.