Legal Opinion

King Bros. Shoe Store Co. v. Wiseman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Civil actioN, tried before Garter, J., and a jury, at August Special Term, 1917, of Avery. Plaintiff sued for $182.80, balance due on note, tbe excess of tbe debt having been remitted. After tbe evidence was closed, tbe court ordered a nonsuit, and tbe action was dismissed, because tbe claim of tbe plaintiff, as tbe court ruled, was barred by tbe statute of limitations.

Read the full summary

Civil actioN, tried before Garter, J., and a jury, at August Special Term, 1917, of Avery. Plaintiff sued for $182.80, balance due on note, tbe excess of tbe debt having been remitted. After tbe evidence was closed, tbe court ordered a nonsuit, and tbe action was dismissed, because tbe claim of tbe plaintiff, as tbe court ruled, was barred by tbe statute of limitations. Tbe defendant, waiving tbe question whether a nonsuit can be granted upon tbe ground stated by tbe court, proved that the defendant bad, on 4 February, 1913, sent tbe following letter to plaintiff: “File your claim’ against…

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, J.,

after stating tbe case: Tbe justice’s court bad jurisdiction as tbe plaintiff duly remitted tbe excess over tbe amount demanded in tbe summons treated as a complaint (Revisal, sec. 1445), which was $182.50. We have often held that the jurisdiction is determined by the amount demanded in good faith, even if plaintiff could have sued for more than $200. Revisal, sec. 1419; Teal v. Templeton, 149 N. C., 32, citing McPhail v. Johnson, 115 N. C., 302; Cromer v. Marsha, 122 N. C., 563; Brantley v. Finch, 97 N. C., 91. It is there said that “had it been doubtful as to the sum demanded,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Helsabeck v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Greenleaf v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Faison v. . Bowden, Ex'r.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Taylor v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Brantley v. . FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Irvin v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Sewing Machine Co. v. . BurgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Farmers Co-Operative Fertilizer Co. v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Tar River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Phillips v. GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API