Legal Opinion

Watters v. Otter

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided December 9, 2013No. Case No. 1:12-cv-00076-BLWPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it Occupy Boise’s renewed motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. 106), challenging administrative rules that Occupy Boise claims restrict First Amendment activity. The Court heard oral argument on Occupy Boise’s renewed or supplemental motion for partial summary judgment on July 23, 2013. It had heard oral argument on Occupy Boise’s first motion for partial summary judgment on February 26, 2013.1 The Court took the motions under advisement. For the reasons set forth below the Court will grant…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bledsoe v. Ferry CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
  2. Cole v. GoossenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  3. Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. Perlot v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
  5. Sierra Club v. City of BoiseDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API