St. Paul F. & M. Ins. v. Hanson
Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota
1Opinion of the CourtFrancis, J.
This action was brought in the district court of the Third judicial district, in and for Ransom county, Dakota territory, to recover on a promissory note for the sum of $42, with interest. The defendant demurred to the complaint, alleging that it appears upon the face of the complaint that the district court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendant elected to stand on his demurrer, and judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and against the defendant, for the amount due upon said promissory note, with interest and costs; and from this…
2Cited by6 opinions
- St. Paul F. & M. Ins. v. ColemanSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
- Gjerstadengen v. HartzellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Loranger v. Big Missouri Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- King v. WaiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Kline v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.