Ethel D. Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
The deficiency asserted for 1919 is barred by the statute of limitations.
1Opinion of the Court
*26OPINION.
Lansdon:
Petitioner contends that the return filed on March 6, 1920, was a sufficient compliance with the statute to start the running of the statute of limitations and that the statutory period as extended by the waivers filed expired on December 31, 1925, as provided in the second waiver.
The respondent contends, first, that the document filed by petitioner on March 6, 1920, which purported to be an income tax return for the calendar year 1919, was not a sufficient return to start the running of the statute of limitations, and, second, that in any event the unlimited waiver filed with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lucas v. Pilliod Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- McManus v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Estate of Camara v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
- Farmers Union State Exchange v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Ribb v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
- Estate of Camara v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.