Legal Opinion · Dissent

Belille v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 1987No. C8-87-433Published

1DissentFoley, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I am not persuaded that appellant was physically unable to provide an adequate breath sample.

The issue of physical inability is a question of fact and the trial court’s findings will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous. Burke v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 381 N.W.2d 903, 904 (Minn.Ct.App.1986). Due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses. Minn.R.Civ.P. 52.01. Here, the majority is substituting its judgment for that of the trial court.

The trial court found that appellant’s alleged physical inability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Burke v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Bale v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Lewandowski v. TschidaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Benson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API