Bollfrass v. Phoenix, City of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Gerald Bollfrass, et al., No. CV-19-04014-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Phoenix, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 The parties have cross-motions for summary judgment pending before the Court. 16 (Docs. 165, 163, 164.) Plaintiffs now move to supplement the record. (Doc. 185.) As 17 explained below, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ motion. 18 I. 19 The Court has elsewhere recited the complex factual and procedural history 20 underlying this case, and will not do so again here. (See, e.g., Doc. 90.)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coszalter v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, Local 1315Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund Board of Trustees v. Michael's Floor Covering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Paul Rodriguez v. Gavin NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020