Legal Opinion · Concurrence

AT&T Communications and Sedgwick CMS v. Victoria Murray Rosso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 2, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D16-3971Published

1ConcurrenceRowe, J.

Under the law in effect for this date of injury, Claimant is entitled to- medically necessary remedial treatment, care, and attendance, as well as professional or nonprofessional custodial care,, as the nature of the injury may require. See § 440.13(2)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). The applicable case law establishes that lawn care services may be awardable under this statutory authority if the medical evidence shows that a claimant’s injury will improve with the provision of services. See Delong v. 3015 W. Corp., 558 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (affirming denial of lawn care services where…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. POLK COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS v. VarnadoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Marlowe v. Dogs Only GroomingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. DeLong v. 3015 WEST CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Southern Industries v. ChumneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API