Legal Opinion

In Re Day

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided March 8, 1935No. 2612PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The original petition was filed herein, under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act as amended (11 USCA § 203), by petitioners as “personal representatives of a deceased farmer.” The petition was duly approved and referred to the conciliation commissioner for the purpose of affording petitioners opportunity to present composition or extension proposal.

However, at the hearing before the conciliation commissioner, the latter, under misapprehension as to his duties, entertained an objection to the jurisdiction upon the part of the secured creditors, to the effect that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1922
  2. In re MatsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Glass v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  4. Gilkey v. National AlumniCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  5. Stephens v. Merchants' Nat. Bank of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Municipal Bond Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Baxter v. Savings Bank of Utica, NYCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. In re GunningDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1941
  4. Stoller v. Cleveland Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API