Hurt v. Kitroser
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtStevenson, J.
Appellants, all individuals and non-residents of Florida, challenge an order of the trial court denying their motions to quash service and to dismiss the wrongful death complaint filed against them for lack of personal jurisdiction. The complaint alleges that appellants were negligent while in Florida conducting business on behalf of their corporate employer. Because the so-called “corporate shield doctrine” is applicable, we must conclude that no personal jurisdiction exists over appellants and reverse.
The relevant jurisdictional facts are contained in the complaint and the uncontested…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Venetian Salami Co. v. ParthenaisSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Doe v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Bloom v. AH Pond Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1981
- Estabrook v. WetmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kitroser v. HurtSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Hurt v. KitroserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010