Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Professional Courier and Newspaper Distribution, d/b/a Brandt Brothers, Inc., et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00973-KES-HBK 12 Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER 13 v. (Doc. No. 9) 14 PROFESSIONAL COURIER AND FEBRUARY 13, 2026 DEADLINE NEWSPAPER DISTRIBUTION, d/b/a 15 Brandt Brothers, Inc., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the court is Plaintiff’s pro se First Amended Complaint filed on August 19 29, 2025. (Doc. 9, “FAC”). Upon review, the Court finds Plaintiff’s FAC, like his initial 20 Complaint, violates Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.