Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1915No. 9,268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Howard Circuit Court; Warren R. Voorhis, Special Judge. Action between Myrtle M. Smith and James G. Smith. From the judgment rendered, the former appealed. The appeal was dismissed on motion of appellant, who subsequently moved to retax the costs.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

On April 24, 1915, appellant filed in the Supreme Court the transcript of the record in this cause. On April 29, 1915, on appellant’s motion of same date the cause was transferred to this court. On May 24, 1915, the cause was submitted under §693 Burns 1914, Acts 1885 p. 219. On August 9, 1915, appellant filed a written dismissal of the. appeal showing therein that the case had been compromised by the parties. The clerk has taxed against the appellant two docket fees, one in the Supreme Court and one in this court.

1. Appellant has filed a motion to retax the costs in respect to such items,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mantle Lamp Co. v. BonichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Stafford v. ConwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mantle Lamp Co. v. BonichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. State v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API