Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court’s denial of the defendant’s request on the eve óf trial for assignment of new counsel was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Rua, 198 AD2d 311). His initial request, through defense counsel, consisted of generalized assertions, which were insufficient to raise a serious complaint triggering a duty of inquiry (see, People v Gaines, 212 AD2d 727). Following the defendant’s additional complaints the next day, the court attempted to ascertain the basis of the complaints but the defendant’s responses and his subsequent refusal to respond to the court were insufficient…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. RuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. StevensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. AllisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API