Na'im v. Payne

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION NUUH AMIR NAIM PLAINTIFF #116249 No: 4:21-cv-1154-DPM SPRINGFELLOW, Dentist“ DEFENDANT ORDER 1. On de novo review, the Court partly adopts and partly declines the recommendation, Doc. 33, and mostly overrules and partly sustains Dr. Stringfellow’s objections, Doc. 34. FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b)(3). 2. _Na’im proceeds pro se, and the Court must liberally construe his pleading and papers. Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (per curiam). The complaint succinctly and specifically outlines Na’im’s dental troubles,…